Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Alternate Vote (AV) - for or against?     

cynic - 25 Apr 2011 07:53

this important referendum is nearly upon us and i thought it would be interesting explore the views held by this BB

after much thought, i have decided to vote against AV
i do not dispute that "first past post the post" is in some ways unfair - so is life and golf! - but i am far from convinced that AV is intrinsically much better

i would rather have a stronger gov't of some hue than a weak coalition or mps (and parties) who have felt obliged to trim their sails to offend the least number and thus gain a few more secondary votes

full-blown PR is at least "fair", but even then, there are many examples of horribly weak and unstable gov'ts, which is also pretty disastrous

finally, and of greatest concern, i suspect the turnout for this referendum will be +/-35% at best and probably a lot lower in many parts of the country
it follows that those who vote in this will be (relative) "activists" for lack of a better word, for the run-of-the-mill voter will find the whole thing too complicated and voting on it all, too much of a fag
thus, if there is a change in our voting system, then it is very likely to have been pushed through by <20% of the electorate - is that fair?

cynic - 26 Apr 2011 12:14 - 27 of 178

quite so fred, but one can only work from the facts and info to hand

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 12:15 - 28 of 178

mna. they would betray there mothers for power ,scum comes to mind

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 12:15 - 29 of 178

mna. they would betray there mothers for power ,scum comes to mind

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 12:16 - 30 of 178

the libs no that thevote will be NO they arenow trying to save there soles

mnamreh - 26 Apr 2011 12:16 - 31 of 178

.

cynic - 26 Apr 2011 12:20 - 32 of 178

tanks - you really are ridiculous at times and merely make yourself look so ..... if you had commented that politicians as a breed rarely if ever act altruistically or somesuch, your post would have had some credibility

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 12:22 - 33 of 178

cynic i think you will find that even the hard line libs would now agree with me .
clegg as done the country a good favour destoying the party which is very good for the country

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 12:25 - 34 of 178

cynic . how many libs in gov will be tory candidates next election ?

cynic - 26 Apr 2011 12:37 - 35 of 178

probably none

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 13:05 - 36 of 178

cynic you would lose money there will be at least one alexander
margret would be proud of him

mnamreh - 26 Apr 2011 13:16 - 37 of 178

.

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 13:36 - 38 of 178

mna. thanks for understanding my post the point is we need the best to return this country round for the good of the uk

aldwickk - 26 Apr 2011 14:01 - 39 of 178

Cynic ,

If Fred is for AV so will Stan

cynic - 26 Apr 2011 14:14 - 40 of 178

utopia is said to be very nice too

mnamreh - 26 Apr 2011 14:46 - 41 of 178

.

Fred1new - 26 Apr 2011 14:55 - 42 of 178

A mature society would be acceptable.

TANKER - 26 Apr 2011 15:36 - 43 of 178

utopia is peace of mind .

cynic - 26 Apr 2011 16:42 - 44 of 178

how very idealistic and unreal this thread has suddenly become :-)
now approach the issue without the rose-tinted specs!

mnamreh - 26 Apr 2011 17:02 - 45 of 178

.

TopAnalyst - 26 Apr 2011 18:09 - 46 of 178

I am removing ALL my research from here due to the constant personal abuse, defamation and distortions of it posted by:

ptholden

hlyeo98

halifax

blackdown

kimoldfield

cynic


This bunch of abusive retards is the reason MoneyAM will NEVER have a forum worth reading.

I have reported them to support by they do nothing, either because they want to force me to PAY them for the Traders Room or because they are too lazy to do anything. Maybe the people in support are the ones perpetrating the abuse, so as to force people to pay for the premium boards. Either way the service is sh1te and a disgrace to the finance industry. No wonder there is nobody left here apart from morons.

I will continue posting my good research on boards that are run in accordance with FSA and LSE listing rules and the interests of the market, not here where ar5eh0les rule the boards and all decent research is buried under their piles of sh1te.
Register now or login to post to this thread.