goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2013 16:22
- 30508 of 81564
Doodles the very fact that Buffet is commentating on a MACRO event is a stand up call in itself.
The fact that he says it will go down to the 11th hour is a warning to all.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2013 16:26
- 30509 of 81564
Cynic dont forget their will be days or half days for counter rallys.
Might be worth researching for companys that have been well oversold in the right sectors and taking out daily trade contracts. That way your not locked in.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2013 16:31
- 30510 of 81564
Breath of fresh air not to have that sad sick maniac Haytrees posting today. Long may it last.
Think Ill put something in the header warning new posters.
Right off to watch the Spurs match on freeview at 4.45pm......come on you spurs.
Swansea on tonight same channel think its nos 24.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2013 16:37
- 30511 of 81564
just had to post this from twitter.
Do you think these guys will be voting Tory................I think not. Osbourne shot in foot.
More than 220,000 middle class parents face fines from HMRC in child benefit crackdown
Nearly a quarter of a million middle class parents face a fine from HM Revenue & Customs over their failure to register for self-assessment after claiming child benefit
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/10351171/More-than-220000-middle-class-parents-face-fines-from-HMRC-in-child-benefit-crackdown.html
cynic
- 03 Oct 2013 16:45
- 30512 of 81564
the taxation system is so complex and indeed opaque in many respects, that it is no surprise if a goodly number of people/families did not even realise they had to start self-assessing .... as i'm sure i would have done, they will have assumed that as they have only one job and no other taxable income, then there was nothing further to do
cynic
- 03 Oct 2013 16:48
- 30513 of 81564
sticky - with CFDs i don't need to do daily trades - i can just open a position and let it run as long as i choose ..... i don't think it'll be so much o'sold stocks to take a look at, but special sits .... NYO was a good (i hope) one this morning, and there'll assuredly be other spivvy stocks which suddenly take the fancy of the lemmings, on which it can be worth riding the momentum
i'ld be more inclined to try to catch (estimate!) the bottom of dow or s+p500 or even ftse, because when an agreement does come - as assuredly it will, there will be at least a hefty DCB .... shortie and skinny are pretty good on those, though i don't agree with shortie's assessment that dow 15,000 was critical other than as a convenient round number
doodlebug4
- 03 Oct 2013 16:54
- 30514 of 81564
Buffett -"We will go right up to the point of extreme idiocy, but we won't cross it," he said in the CNBC interview, appearing somewhat exasperated as he spoke.
In a nutshell what he thinks about the politicians running his country!
aldwickk
- 03 Oct 2013 18:21
- 30515 of 81564
I only hold AFR now.
What would the Gold price do if their go though the dept ceiling ?
aldwickk
- 03 Oct 2013 18:22
- 30516 of 81564
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2013 19:07
- 30517 of 81564
Oh no! Gf is a Spurs supporter. I may have to start supporting Arsenal instead.
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2013 19:13
- 30518 of 81564
The problems in the US should be a warning to people who want an elected upper chamber here. Having a dual house with no superiority of one house leads to stupisd situations. At the moment, we have the Parliament Act to ratify legislation rejected by the Lords. It has been suggested that we should abandon the PA and have equal houses. That is a US situation waiting to happen. If you think the coalition is bad then imagine one legislature being Conservative dominated and the other Labour. Even worse, the two houses might be coalitions of different mixes.
MaxK
- 03 Oct 2013 20:17
- 30519 of 81564
cynic
- 03 Oct 2013 20:23
- 30520 of 81564
hays is quite right .... as i implied earlier, the american system is a total disaster and i'm quite sure it's not at all what the founding fathers had in mind
MaxK
- 04 Oct 2013 00:11
- 30521 of 81564
Oh dear, Cameroon bottling it again....anyone surprised (except Haystack)?
Clegg happy to include Farage in TV debates
Nick Clegg has said that he would be “relaxed” about Nigel Farage taking part in television debates before the next election, leaving David Cameron as the only party leader opposing the UK Independence Party leader’s involvement.
By Peter Dominiczak, Political Correspondent
9:11PM BST 03 Oct 2013
The Deputy Prime Minister said Mr Farage’s involvement should be a decision for television broadcasters.
Speaking to LBC radio Mr Clegg said that there is an “assumption that what you should have is the leaders of the big parties that are represented in Parliament, who can actually play a role in governing this country”.
However, when asked about the Ukip leader’s involvement he added: “I’m relatively relaxed about it.”
Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, has also said that he is happy to “debate anybody” when asked about Mr Farage.
Mr Farage said Mr Cameron was “fearful” of debating him. “With Clegg happy to debate me, and Ed having made it clear he was OK with it in the past, it looks the only one too fearful to come to the feast is Mr Cameron,” Mr Farage said. “I have to say on this one, to coin a phrase, 'I agree with Nick’.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/10354642/Clegg-happy-to-include-Farage-in-TV-debates.html
Haystack
- 04 Oct 2013 01:16
- 30522 of 81564
Farage has no MPs and little chance of getting any. Of course he shouldn't be allowed in TV debate. It gives him more credence than he deserves. Why not have the Green party or the Monster Raving Loony party. The TV debate is not a right for any party. It is just a piece of television. The public have come to expect a TV debate these days. I am sure Miluband/Clegg can arrange a televised debate if they want one.
Haystack
- 04 Oct 2013 01:23
- 30523 of 81564
I am looking forward to a Conservative clear majority and then they can repeal the hunting ban.
Chris Carson
- 04 Oct 2013 07:17
- 30524 of 81564
That statement just makes you look silly H. Hardly number one on the list of priority. Why would that concern you anyway? Don't you live in the City?
cynic
- 04 Oct 2013 07:33
- 30525 of 81564
farage has as much right to a tv debate as the conservatives have of getting an overall majority in the next election
aldwickk
- 04 Oct 2013 08:23
- 30526 of 81564
Haystack
Fox hunting is a cruel blood sport that should be banned forever , there are just as many chicken's killed by dog's and nearly all sheep are killed by dog's.There is no massive problem from fox's.
Haven't heard anything about all those hunting dog's and horse's that were going to be killed if there was a ban , also the mass unempolyment in the countryside.
ps a slight problem in the city's , but they do clear up a lot of waste food that would have been eated by rat's.
aldwickk
- 04 Oct 2013 08:27
- 30527 of 81564
Chris
I have been onto Chess . com , yes its a very good free site , i have made a note of your username.