Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

MaxK - 08 May 2015 22:53 - 59976 of 81564

He'll be back, just like Arnie :-)


cynic - 09 May 2015 08:49 - 59977 of 81564

sticky briefly emerged with a bad hangover and then slunk off again :-)

jimmy b - 09 May 2015 09:01 - 59978 of 81564

cynic ,,,looking over the road , those threads never really took off ,GF doesn't post anything like as much as the years he was on here.

cynic - 09 May 2015 09:13 - 59979 of 81564

i know and it's a shame, and there's several other "sensible" threads that also do not receive the attention they deserve

perhaps it's a reflection on the general membership of advfn who would seem to like just gibbering (even worse and more so than me!) and slagging off anyone who dares to disagree with the prevailing sentiment

jimmy b - 09 May 2015 09:30 - 59980 of 81564

Which is why i never spent much time there , you usually have to read through 300 post of rubbish to get to one sensible one .
I did go over recently but there is never much there ,looks like shortie doesn't post any more either.

required field - 09 May 2015 10:53 - 59981 of 81564

I'm not surprised the Lib-Dems have beed decimated : their policies are just rubbish !.....but in a democracy ; you need an opposition....perhaps Labour will now put forward better and more sensible ideas for the next election ! in five years time.......though I doubt it as they are just stuck in a backward out of date mentality......what did I hear on the result from some of their supporters ; that they needed much more lefty policies.....they just won't learn will they ?......

Haystack - 09 May 2015 11:35 - 59982 of 81564

Which bozo, Muppet, geek, lefty will the unions pick for Labour leader this time?

aldwickk - 09 May 2015 12:49 - 59983 of 81564

The Labour bonus for us was Harriet Harman resigning. Best chance of a Labour comeback would be Alan Johnson as leader

Paddy Ashdown on QT was a pompous twat, why can't he keep is eye's open

John Snow was good on Have I got news , someone said Vince Cable had his bike stolen outside while waiting for the results, and he said that was two seat's he lost that night

Haystack - 09 May 2015 12:56 - 59984 of 81564

Alan Johnson is a nice guy, but not leader material. I would be happy with him as he would be easy to beat.

The unions might like him as he claims to be a Marxist and supporter of the Communist party. Another lefty would be the kiss of death for Labour.

ExecLine - 09 May 2015 13:04 - 59985 of 81564

My £5 says they will take a chance on Chuka Amunna, letting him build up strength and experience up to the next election.

aldwickk - 09 May 2015 13:22 - 59986 of 81564

And his the right colour for the ever growing non white voter

Haystack - 09 May 2015 13:23 - 59987 of 81564

Is he acceptable to the unions?

Haystack - 09 May 2015 13:24 - 59988 of 81564

I think it is Ummuna.

aldwickk - 09 May 2015 14:03 - 59989 of 81564

Don't think he would be acceptable to the unions

ExecLine - 09 May 2015 15:58 - 59990 of 81564

We are no longer one country.

Someone has worked out the extraordinary fact that the four nations which make up the United Kingdown are each now dominated by a different political party.

Last time a different party topped the poll in all four parts of the UK?

Probably 1832.

Haystack - 09 May 2015 16:20 - 59991 of 81564

I look upon Scotland as just northern England etc. Nicola thinks she is going to stop austerity. She has no chance. What the public wanted was more austerity. The peoole in work are gradually doing better and expected that to accelerate. Austerity is a very popular policy. Recent polling showed more than 70% were in favour.

Priority will be given to constituency boundary changes which will cost Labour dearly at the next selection, making it even more difficult to be elected. The referendum legislation will be passed sooner rather than later (probably this year).

Miliband was rejected due to more factors than could be overlooked.

He was a complete embarrassment
He was too left wing
His party was not trusted on the economy
He was opposed to a referendum on the EU
His judgement was clearly in question after the monolith
He was expected to borrow and tax again
He was tainted by being part of Brown's workers
He stabbed his brother in the back
He was in the pockets of the unions

ExecLine - 09 May 2015 17:55 - 59992 of 81564

Agreed

Just a little bit of 'edit':

His SPENDING judgement was clearly in question after the monolith.

Apparently, it cost around £30k. It couldn't have been placed in the garden of No 10 either. No 10 is a listed building and the Planners are all Tories. :-)

Some think he actually stabbed his brother in the front, not the back. But who cares now?

ExecLine - 09 May 2015 18:01 - 59993 of 81564

I felt a need to check up on what 'goverment austerity spending' actually is and what the term means. Apparently, there are also degrees of 'austerity spending' too.

More at: http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6254/economics/what-is-austerity/

MaxK - 09 May 2015 18:18 - 59994 of 81564

There's nowt so strange as folk.



Emily Thornberry (elected)

Labour Party



51%

22,547

Haystack - 09 May 2015 18:51 - 59995 of 81564

If the Tories had done the soon to come boundary changes before the election, they would have had 53% of the commons as opposed to Labour on 35%.

Labour are already crying foul. The intention is to reduce the commons from 650 to 690 seats. The effects are as follows:

The figures for English regions are given below (percentage reductions in brackets):

North East to lose three seats (-10%)
North West to lose seven seats (-9%)
West Midlands to lose five seats (-8%)
Yorkshire and the Humber to lose four seats (-7%)
London to lose five seats (-7%)
South West to lose two seats (-4%)
East Midlands to lose two seats (-4%)
Eastern England to lose to seats (-3%)
South East to lose one seat (-1%).

The reason is that the constituencies are not equal. The Conservaticpves need to get far more votes to get an MP elected than Labour due to the imbalance between urban and rural populations for each seat.

The aim is to make each constituency contain 76,641 voters within 5%.
Register now or login to post to this thread.