Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

Dil - 26 Sep 2010 20:50 - 8572 of 8631

... and if you think Barry is whiter than white then you too are living in lala land.

I gave him two examples of where he had lied when he asked me tabby but he still didn't come back and answer my questions ... you forgot to copy that on here !

jkd - 26 Sep 2010 20:56 - 8573 of 8631

Personally i just consider myself a chartist. as in, read the charts.or at least try to. sometimes i am right and sometimes i am wrong. so why do i bother? mostly because i find it offers me a degree of protection from that which is said and reported and that which actually is. as is being what is actually going on "behind the scene" or should that be screen?
if that "lost" invoice had not got paid, which i dont know if it did or not. does anyone? if so please advise and confirm.and if it hadn't, been paid that is, then lack of funds may not have proven a problem. this can easily be verified by a simple statement. i.e. yes it did get paid ,or no it didn't get paid. who is best positioned to make such a statement?
so lets hear it.
anyway as a none shareholder i suppose i will be informed that it is none of my concern or business. thats fair enough. maybe someone who is a shareholder might like to ask the question? in the mean time the saga continues.
regards
jkd

tabasco - 27 Sep 2010 06:52 - 8574 of 8631

Very interesting? >

mad mike - 26 Sep'10 - 23:41 - 17310 of 17314

scottie, a technical correction to your post #17308.

There are circumstance where it is unnecessary to gain access to an individuals's account statements to prove trading has occurred (& thus possibly insider trading).

You would need account access for many (but not all) nominee accounts, CfDs and spreadbets.

However, you don't need such access with certificated shares, or CREST accounts where you already know who controls the CREST account (even if it is classed as a nominee account). In these cases, all you need is access to a company's full transaction share register. A company has such access to its own transaction share register, though most companies don't seem to realise it.

As explained in my much earlier visit report to HQ, following a fair amount of investigation, I worked out how Meldex management could get a copy of Meldex's full transaction share register. Thanks to Barry, I have a copy i.e. a three year full transaction share register. Of course Barry also has a copy.

FYI, a full transaction share register records every single share transaction in a company's shares (matched buy & sell between named accounts), whether on or off market, plus all new share issues, and any share cancellations.

tabasco - 27 Sep 2010 07:53 - 8575 of 8631

jkd - 26 Sep 2010 20:56 - 8573 of 8574
Personally i just consider myself a chartist.
----------------------------
No!..you are much more than that my little peeps?.lol

tabasco - 30 Sep 2010 08:46 - 8576 of 8631

cambridge-news.co.uk

Published: 28/09/2010 09:23 - Updated: 28/09/2010 09:27
Meldex losses total 74m as administrators go in
Former AIM-listed Meldex International, previously known as BioProgress and based on Cambridge Science Park, has gone into administration with losses of 74m.

The administrators are working with the directors to sell the firms main trading subsidiary, BioProgress Technology, as a going concern and its business is unaffected.
Chris McKay, of administrators McTear Williams & Wood, said: The companys recent past has not been pretty. Its last reported accounts showed losses of 74m, caused largely by write-offs of bad investments made by the previous directors.
Meldex floated on AIM in 2003 with a market capitalisation of 16m and reached a high of 150m to become the darling of the AIM market.
In 2005 the shares were the most traded on AIM. However, after a series of disastrous largely by write-offs of bad investments made by the previous directors.
Meldex floated on AIM in 2003 with a market capitalisation of 16m and reached a high of 150m to become the darling of the AIM market.
In 2005 the shares were the most traded on AIM. However, after a series of disastrous investments a new management team (including the return of Barry Muncaster) was bought in January 2009 to try and turn the companys fortunes around.
Having spent a few months restructuring the business, new funds were introduced from existing shareholders and creditors in September 2009.
Mr Muncaster said: What we found on our arrival was quite a shock. The actions of the previous directors left the company little choice but to pursue them through the courts. This proved to be a highly costly action. Recently, previously unknown liabilities have resulted in the company no longer being able to meet its debts. For those who put new money into the company last year under a fresh issue of loan notes, there is some hope. The money advanced was secured over the assets of the company and any sale of the subsidiary should result in funds being returned to the loan note holders.
Mr McKay said: There is a lesson here for all investors. If you need to put new money into a business to keep it afloat, try to secure the debt against some assets. It wont guarantee that you will get your money back but it certainly moves you up the creditors list.
Any interested parties or investors should contact the joint administrators immediately, he said.
Meldex, via BioProgress Technology, is involved in developing non-gelatin edible films for the pharmaceutical, healthcare and recreational industries in other words, pill-coatings for vegetarians.

Dil - 30 Sep 2010 09:05 - 8577 of 8631

"... in other words, pill-coatings for vegetarians"


A world beater lol

Treblewide - 30 Sep 2010 12:54 - 8578 of 8631

what a mess but i bet somone has done very well out of it

Dil - 01 Oct 2010 15:56 - 8579 of 8631

Two ?

Big Al - 08 Oct 2010 18:32 - 8580 of 8631

Just popped by for a laugh. ;-))

Why do people believe things a BoD says. Rule 1 is that they always talk it up. If you can't get to grips with that then stay out of the markets.

Dil - 10 Oct 2010 00:57 - 8581 of 8631

Not true Al , subsidaries of multi national companies that have to pay 100% of profit to parent company as dividends are imo likely to do the opposite.


Apparently :-)


Dil - 10 Oct 2010 00:59 - 8582 of 8631

... uck me I could teach Barry and his merry men a few things about "reserves" :-)

Dil - 15 Oct 2010 00:45 - 8583 of 8631

His imaginary loan is just that apparently and now the sln holders are about to get diluted (?) !

Couldn't make this crap up ...

Big Al - 15 Oct 2010 07:50 - 8584 of 8631

Eh?

Andy - 16 Oct 2010 00:09 - 8585 of 8631

The story is degenerating from soap opera to pure farce!

Gausie - 17 Oct 2010 17:35 - 8586 of 8631

Andy

'Twas always so.

Andy - 18 Oct 2010 23:37 - 8587 of 8631

Gausie,

:-)

Interesting posts from the factoid tonight!

jeffmack - 19 Oct 2010 04:14 - 8588 of 8631

Taby was right all along, Barry never loses


Meldex Factoid - 18 Oct'10 - 19:36 - 19489 of 19567

POST NUMBER 4


So I do not offend I will say nothing of opinion but ask Mr Mike to give it instead.

Meldex Administrator wrote these exact words in his particulars for Meldex which went to creditors in the last five days:


Directors Remuneration for the period ending 31 December 2008 = 959,000
Directors Remuneration for the period ending 31 December 2009 = 1,459,000

Dil - 19 Oct 2010 10:34 - 8589 of 8631

It was an error jeff , 2009 figures are really 2007's ... administrator as good with figures as an meldex director !

Dil - 20 Oct 2010 21:05 - 8590 of 8631

Any thoughts on this tabby ???




Meldex Factoid - 20 Oct'10 - 20:19 - 19826 of 19842


POST NUMBER 5

So I wont upset Mr M Mike I will give no opinion on this message from Mr Gary which agrees a false bid by him and Mr Barry and Mr Richard.

So I wont upset Mr N Mike I can say for sure there are no typos.


From: gcressman@aol.com [mailto:gcressman@aol.com]
Sent: Sat 04/10/2008 18:40
To:
Subject: Re: From the bulletin boards

Incidentally on the Barry Muncaster "bid" there was a meeting on a friday between barry me and Richard that agreed to launching some sort of bid to flush out buyers that Richard stated were watching the situation. I went away from that meeting thinking it was all very preliminary and needed further work . So I was very surprised to see the share price rising on the monday followed by an approach announcement. I am now fairly sure that it was engineered by Richard leaking then RNSing the approach which Barry has on record as him not agreeing to until after the RNS!!


ptholden - 20 Oct 2010 22:40 - 8591 of 8631

Looks like the information dam is about to burst in the zoo.
Register now or login to post to this thread.