goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
aldwickk
- 18 Nov 2010 10:14
- 10061 of 81564
Some of the biggest winner's of the gravy train is organised crime such as the Mafia who have politicians on their payroll .
mnamreh
- 18 Nov 2010 10:16
- 10062 of 81564
.
aldwickk
- 18 Nov 2010 10:22
- 10063 of 81564
Tony Blair for Euro President ..... if he could find the time. Gordon Brown is out of a job saving the European union would be easy after saving the World
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 10:37
- 10064 of 81564
Greek.
They could rejuvenate the tory cabinet with them.
Don't write the EU off. Britain may go there with a begging bowl yet.
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 11:25
- 10065 of 81564
N,
Cameron's attempt to put the previous tory party photographers and film maker on the public purse, seems to me to be a form of corruption or an abuse of public funds. Good god out of my taxes.
It would seem to me that the present prime minister, would have been aware of this situation and may have even nodded at another cost cutting activity.
This was a blatant action (abuse of position) and very similar to some acts of EU corruption, or tickets on the gravy train.
Of course, it is brushed aside by many of the passengers.
Ah well, such is life.
mnamreh
- 18 Nov 2010 11:46
- 10066 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 12:19
- 10067 of 81564
N,
You have just complicated what I thought was simple.
8-)
Perhaps, it is because some at a very early age cease to be allowed think and then to make and act on their own decisions. i.e. they have to conform to survive in their environment and then frightened to dissent, based on that which has been integrated, or indoctrinated into them at a very early age.
To me, there is a tremendous difference between knowledge and intelligence, but is would be nice to be knowledgeable and intelligent.
(But, it is reasonable to question what you know, as this "knowledge base" is sometimes based on false beliefs.)
mnamreh
- 18 Nov 2010 12:33
- 10068 of 81564
.
greekman
- 18 Nov 2010 12:46
- 10069 of 81564
Could not believe what I read a few days ago. Pakistan who as we know are a country with sufficient money to be a nuclear power and run a space program, have asked that any further foreign aid payments given by Britain are made via cash transfers. They have also stated that they think it is totally wrong that we should have any say in where that money is spent.
To me this sounds totally ridiculous, but no doubt, quite rightly the Pakistan Government think that we will agree to this suggestion/demand.
The thing is I was totally bemused as to why they should demand this change. Of course it can't be so that any existing paper trail, no matter how flimsy, disappears altogether, allowing them to spend an even larger percentage of such aid on corruption, can it!
Also much of this monetary aid, is according to previous reports, being given to the tribal areas, due to most such tribes being in need. Same report gave reasons for why terrorism, especially the Al-Qaeda training camps are allowed to flourish in the remote tribal areas. Several tribal elders stated that, they would never inform on Al-Qaeda members, as many are connected by blood ties to the same tribes.
So one also wonders how much aid money is going to support such groups. How many of out troops are being killed, by bullet and bomb, paid for by the UK tax payer.
No wonder we as a country are the laughing stock/soft touch of the world.
How much longer are the British public going to stand for such nonsense.
mnamreh
- 18 Nov 2010 12:51
- 10070 of 81564
.
greekman
- 18 Nov 2010 13:21
- 10071 of 81564
No, I do not feel we have reached that point yet. What I am advocating is pressure within the law. I often contact the media, expressing my views, as well as contacting MPs on differing subjects. Whilst the MPs allowances inquiry (criminal activity) was ongoing, I wore a 'T' shirt with the words, 'Our MPs are institutionally morally corrupt. I often wore this when attending our local speakers corner, where several MPs, both already standing and potential candidates meet with the public. Many commented, all to the positive when they read the message.
I feel that far too many people in this country are content to just keep quite. We need far more people to stand up and be counted.
There is always a time when/if things get so bad, that matters have to be taken further, and I am not saying, things such as the increased student fees, but if things ever get to the stage of a dictatorial, oppressive state such as for example, China, Burma and many Muslim ruled countries, where actual force is the only route open to the populous.
Everyone has their limits.
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 14:00
- 10072 of 81564
Having pillaged India, Pakistan, and the rest of the commonwealth for long periods, it would seem reasonable to repay a little occaisonally.
The nuclear programmes would suggest to me thinking of the future wealth and economy of the country, rather than being cap in hand to other more "wealthy "countries"" in the future.
Thus enabling them to lift some of those countries populace to "decent" standards of living. (I have written before people with full bellies prefer to sleep than go to war.)
"It is a pity that Maggie and the present crew didn't have the ability to think of the long term future, rather than the bottom line of short term gains and appeal of strutting the stage to its foolowers. What happened to the industrial base. Is the same sort of result going to occur in education.)
Anyway, it is again interesting another form of pillaging is likely to be happening again, i.e. allowing the educated and professional classes to enter this country to an expense of their own. (That's OK. for now, but you can B. off when Britain no longer "needs" you. By the way we won't pay you as much as you fellows in the "work place".
I wonder why that when they go home they are disgruntled and antagonistic to Britain.
Perhaps. if we had been more sensible when we "controlled", or "ruled" some of these countries and help them provide decent infrastructures, we may not have generated so much hate.
Ah, well.
rawdm999
- 18 Nov 2010 14:12
- 10073 of 81564
By that thinking we should be asking the Scandinavians and Italians et al to compensate us for their pillaging. It may have been much further into history but it nevertheless happened. But wait! maybe we should thank them for the civilisation they brought with them. What have the Romans ever done for us?
Did we not benefit our colonial outposts at all? No governance, no roads, railways, agriculture?
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 15:08
- 10074 of 81564
RAW.
Built straight roads!
Agree, that there has to be some time restrictions on obligation to recompense for previous actions.etc..
The levels of "compensation" paid, also have to be proportionate to the ability to pay.
It is unrealistic, not to recognise our limitations as a "small country" and have them. But, as an optimist, I think much of the "aid" will have some human benefit, decrease some suffering and probable ameliorating of previous ill feelings towards this country.
However, you could also mention the above to the "Zionists, who wish to go back to contracts with god made many thousands of years ago". eg. "The Promised Land".
"Did we not benefit our colonial outposts at all?"
Yes, but as one would expect, the benefits of the colonisation was disproportionally towards the colonists i.e. Britain not the occupied countries.
I would be happy to reclaim England for the Welsh, Irish and Scots, but find little support for doing so.
(At the moment, but I am working on it.) 8-)
rawdm999
- 18 Nov 2010 15:27
- 10075 of 81564
It is difficult to judge if the benefits of colonisation were biased towards us and not. It depends on the timescale. For example, India. We may have taken from it at the time but gave something back over time. If we hadn't colonised India it might have become nothing more than a poor backwater, or indeed many fractious states. Who knows, the deed was done.
You will probably say we are still taking (doctors/nurses) but that is because we have globalised social and economic mobility. We don't pressgang them to come here to work we just dangle the bigger proverbial carrot.
edit - ignoring the 'contracts with god' bit, no interest in getting into religious territory.
Fred1new
- 18 Nov 2010 16:12
- 10076 of 81564
It is difficult to judge if the benefits of colonisation were biased towards us and not.
I am sure we sent navies, armies guns and explosives for the benefit of the indigenous populations and didn't extract more than the expense for doing so.
Unfortunately, some of the people of those colonies don't seem to have "advanced" very much by our colonisation.
"If" and "might" are mighty big words but from observation I think Britain and others could "have done better".
It isn't the movement of the " the professionals". which needs examining but outcome of the filters being applied.
Mixed "feelings" about immigration and/or emigration. Feel, that if the "quality" of "life" in the other countries was thought to "equate" more "reasonably" to ours, some of the movements would not occur.
Again, not certain if the results would be good or bad.
Dil
- 19 Nov 2010 15:03
- 10077 of 81564
What you moaning about now Fred , "you've never had it so good" :-)
Fred1new
- 19 Nov 2010 15:59
- 10078 of 81564
Dil,
Not moaning, just observing.
Glad I am retired and doing a damn sight better than expected.
So I am told.
My wife is smiling at me, not sure why, but have noticed the tea tastes a bit bitter.
aldwickk
- 21 Nov 2010 10:54
- 10079 of 81564
Spike Milligan has been credited with creating the World's funniest joke.
Professor Richard Wiseman of the University of Hertfordshire carried out the biggest internet experiment to discover the world's most popular joke in 2001. It took him twelve months to compile the submitted 40,000 jokes, to be voted by 300,000 people from all around the world.
The result was a joke about two hunters in the woods of New Jersey. One collapses and the other calls the emergency services for help. The operator tells the hunter to remain calm and, firstly, to establish if the collapsed man is dead.
The operator hears a gunshot then the hunter comes back on the line and asks, 'Okay? What now?'
Since then Professor Wiseman has been trying to track the roots of this joke to no avail until he saw an Australian documentary that aired a rare clip of The Goons first television broadcast in 1951.
Michael Bentine: I just came in and found him lying on the carpet there.
Peter Sellers: Oh, is he dead?
Bentine: I think so.
Sellers: Hadn't you better make sure?
Bentine: Alright. Just a minute.
Sound of two gun shots.
Bentine: He's dead.
With Milligan having died in 2002 of liver failure (the last of The Goons), Professor Wiseman then went to Milligan's daughter in an attempt to verify his authorship. She said that she was certain that he had been responsible for it.
Professor Wiseman said, "Doing the experiment I heard so many jokes and many were quite similar, but what is nice about this one is it is totally unexpected. What is also interesting is the fact it does not rely too much on word play or puns, so the joke will not be lost in translation into other languages
Professor Richard Wiseman of the University of Hertfordshire seem's to have had a lot of time on his hand's. I wonder how much money this research cost ?
aldwickk
- 21 Nov 2010 11:02
- 10080 of 81564
" she was certain that he had been responsible for it " , sound's like she didn't like the joke, lol