Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Falklands Oil and Gas (FOGL) (FOGL)     

Proselenes - 13 Aug 2011 04:53

.

cynic - 28 Jul 2012 14:55 - 1074 of 2393

Prostate - as your new sobriquet suggests, yet again you are talking out of your arse, working as usual from preferred surmise and not knowledge ..... if i say i own a certain share or have traded at a given price, then that is a matter of fact and you would be very stupid (some say you are anyway) to call me a liar ..... it would be better still if the stuff you posted about this and other shares was also based on HARD FACT rather than wishful thinking, extrapolation, hypothesis, non sequitur and supposition ...... if you did so, then you just might have some credibility

Proselenes - 28 Jul 2012 15:49 - 1075 of 2393

LOL - you are funny :)

blackdown - 28 Jul 2012 20:30 - 1076 of 2393

Which all goes to show that f**k all of any meaningful sort is happening re this share and it would be best to put this thread (and Mrs P as she surely is) into hibernation until nearer the results of a drill (probably sometime close to Christmas).

Proselenes - 29 Jul 2012 15:37 - 1077 of 2393

Considering the upper targets at Loligo are most likely gas, and the lower ones probably oil - here is the result I am hoping for from the 5 targets to be drilled at Loligo.


T1 = 9 TCF recoverable gas on a P50 basis.

T1 Deep = 3.8 TCF recoverable gas on a P50 basis.

Trigg and Trigg Deep is 969 million recoverable barrels of oil - P50.

Three Bears = 1588 million recoverable barrels of oil - P50.

This gives a 4.7 bboe figure in total (4.7 billion barrels of oil equivalent, if you convert the gas to boe and add on to the oil barrels).


That result would give 12.8 TCF recoverable (well over the 5TCF recoverable minimum for economic development in the South Falklands and also well over the 10TCF level at which development becomes very attractive for gas).

On top of that for short term there would be circa 2.5 billion barrels of oil for quick development.

chuckles - 29 Jul 2012 15:44 - 1078 of 2393

I'm hoping for one trillion recoverable barrels of oil - P10 (from my back garden).

Where on earth do you dream up these ridiculous figures? You're not right in the head! Lol

Proselenes - 29 Jul 2012 16:21 - 1079 of 2393

They are the official company estimates for Loligo reservoirs.

Try reading the Edison note - 4.7 billion recoverable barrels of oil equivalent (4.7bboe) for Loligo as P50.

http://www.edisoninvestmentresearch.co.uk/search/Falkland%20Oil%20&%20Gas

The only ridiculous thing around here is people trying to say its not true............

markymar - 29 Jul 2012 16:53 - 1080 of 2393

http://www.fox-davies.com/media/35357/sfbupdate160712.pdf

Fox Davies

He lives in a little fantasy world of his own chuckles,all he does is cut and paste the same carp on every B&B

The only thing in the SFB found is some gas and a ruddy big coal mine in the middle of no where.

Back down me mine to feed the pit ponies

cynic - 29 Jul 2012 17:40 - 1081 of 2393

P50 = 50% chance of finding anything - they think ....... if they get the right bit of "i think" then it'll be case of just how much of anything have they found ...... and i see prostate is back on the (baby)oil tack once more

required field - 29 Jul 2012 20:42 - 1082 of 2393

Cynic, Marky... what if they strike lucky.....ok Prosels ramps a bit but you have to admit that there is a big chance of them hitting something commercial based on the firm's seismics.....five targets in one well is not to be sneezed at !...he does put some good stuff on here, perhaps too repeatable....but let's give him credit.....he's a good blogger (never know whether you put one g or two for the spelling) to have around...

HARRYCAT - 29 Jul 2012 21:02 - 1083 of 2393

Prolific blogger, rf, not necessarilya good blogger! But can't fault the enthusiasm.
Am happy to hold FOGL and will trade in & out when the drilling starts! The P? figure is just wishful thinking, imo and is only (semi) useful to long term holders.

markymar - 29 Jul 2012 21:59 - 1084 of 2393

Big chance of them hitting some thing RF......not at 15% chance of success it aint.

Proselenes - 30 Jul 2012 02:26 - 1085 of 2393

Very misleading cynic.

P50 means its the median estimate for the size of any discovery - should a discovery be made. It has nothing to do with the chances of finding gas or oil.


cynic - 29 Jul 2012 17:40 - 1081 of 1084
P50 = 50% chance of finding anything - they think

Proselenes - 31 Jul 2012 02:08 - 1086 of 2393

Its a sign.............. 4 targets good and 1 bad from the Loligo 5

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18907147

.

Proselenes - 31 Jul 2012 06:56 - 1087 of 2393

Rig is now underway, moved about 50km over night in the direction of Loligo.


http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/default.aspx?mmsi=308243000&centerx=-58.13182&centery=-53.6912&zoom=10&type_color=9


The fun now begins for FOGL..............

cynic - 31 Jul 2012 09:00 - 1088 of 2393

i'm moe than happy to be corrected or are you just moving words about?

Shortie - 31 Jul 2012 10:32 - 1089 of 2393

P50 means its the median estimate for the size of any discovery - should a discovery be made. Now thats a statement for splitting hairs!!

I prefer Cynic's 50% chance as its more realistic that anything will be found at all. No point thinking about this is terms of estimated size of 'find' when 'find' has yet to be 'found'...

wessexmario - 31 Jul 2012 10:38 - 1090 of 2393

Pro is right, there is a difference between the probability of finding (the CoS), and the estimated amount of oil (a volume somewhere between the P10 and P90 values).

ie. with poor sesmic and no field history, you might think there's a small chance (low CoS) of finding a certain quantity of oil (a P10-P90 range of possible volume), but with good sesmic and an established oil field, another well might target the same P10-P90 range, but the CoS would be much higher.

But putting it another way..
you could look at any well as a black/white 50-50 split...
either it's commercial, or it's not.

Shortie - 31 Jul 2012 11:05 - 1091 of 2393

Pro is right to the text book, I didn't think Cynic was being 'very misleading' in his earlier post but more technically incorrect. All the same Pro's posts highlight the chances of the size of discovery when I think the chances of finding anything at all is more relevant. This is an unchartered field, no history and you can argue the quality of data. Probability estimates are better suited to established fields with history and I think are misleading when used against new drills on unchartered fields.

Proselenes - 31 Jul 2012 12:04 - 1092 of 2393

2010 was a good year for year end AIM stocks rally. 2011 was a bad year. Hoping 2012 is another August to April AIM stocks rally on lots of ECB and US Fed stimulus. They have talked the bad stuff, now its time to talk everything up again.

If 2012 follows 2010 and an August 12 to April 13 rally, it will be good.

Below is the FTSE AIM for 2010/11 and 12 so far, looking like a repeat of 2010 imo so far. Its on the support line of 2010 and 2011 - should be primed now for a surge upwards into year end.

axx.gif

.

cynic - 31 Jul 2012 16:38 - 1093 of 2393

and to clarify further .... using my "meaning", P90 = bugger all chance of finding anything, whereas as P10 is what should prick up the ears - rather than prick up the arse with P90 ..... i guess that makes P50 little more than flaccid - i.e. of fuck all interest!
Register now or login to post to this thread.