Proselenes
- 13 Aug 2011 04:53
.
Proselenes
- 08 Sep 2012 13:33
- 1496 of 2393
What a sad person you are chuckles, you contribute nothing at all to this thread and yet abuse those who do contribute to information about FOGL.
Thats is really sad.
grannyboy
- 08 Sep 2012 16:32
- 1497 of 2393
Yes Proselenes it makes you wonder what "HIS" motives are, apparently it looks to be just him and the "ODD" tweedle dee, tweedle dum's, who gets upset with all the research that you post up.
And sometime's no matter how much you state the "RISK's" its never enough for some posters and that even when you're invested in a share you're not allowed to express any optimism, "because you might inadvertently influence the vulnerable"...lmao!
cynic
- 08 Sep 2012 20:40
- 1498 of 2393
nor it seems is expressing a contrary view or advising extreme caution or even scepticism as to the motives of the incessant rantings of the rampers - sorry, optimists
grannyboy
- 08 Sep 2012 21:22
- 1499 of 2393
Whats this "contrary" view you are talking about now, you're not satisfied with the so called rampers, you've now added a new dimension, Proselenes and most other "holders" keep highlighting the RISK's" thats attached to this stock, but we do certainly put forward the hugh upside "IF" they do hit commercial HC's...
chuckles
- 08 Sep 2012 21:48
- 1500 of 2393
Abuse pro-ramper-leses?
I haven't abused you, except to state you are ramping this stock non stop. Not surprised to see your mate grannyboy appear in your defense, should you get a room together? You're both very amusing, pmsl :)
grannyboy
- 08 Sep 2012 23:27
- 1501 of 2393
Well what would you call your post then chuckles, informative(NO),altruistic(NO),anything of consequence(NO), Ho dear you know what that means don't you chucky?..WHAT THE FECK ARE YOU POSTING FOR!!!.
As to "should you get a room together", is that the best you can come up with, a shallow juvenile reposte...
cynic
- 09 Sep 2012 05:52
- 1502 of 2393
chuckles - ignore the old woman; she's just P's poodle who always follows directly in his footsteps ....... anyway, it's obvious that P has never heard of TMI - aka blinding with science ..... in this particular, it will be FACTS + RESULTS that carry the day, and to date there are none ...... the market clearly has little faith in the hypothetical hype that is bandied here ad nauseam
chuckles
- 09 Sep 2012 12:52
- 1503 of 2393
I'd call my post a waste of time grannyboy, much like all of yours on this thread. let's be honest you're only here to prop up the ramper, you've never added anything of substance except to cheer lead pro-ramper-leses.
Which one are you?
chuckles
- 09 Sep 2012 12:53
- 1504 of 2393
Now that is funny
ta-da :-)
grannyboy
- 09 Sep 2012 16:51
- 1505 of 2393
They say simple things pleases simple minds!!, and i see you get quite a thrill out of that photo, hope you're not having fantasies of been the lad wearing no 13?!!, I thought at first i could see a couple of coconuts on that coconut tree and thought of tweedle dee(cynic) and tweedle dum(you), but no they're just marble size, must be your nuts.
As to my not posting any research, I could'nt compete with the excellent information already posted by Proselenes..
As to cynic, you can't be holding shares in here with the comments that you constantly churn out in your own belief that you're being altruistic. And as you keep saying nothings been proven YET, but if you're in earlier enough then the risk(downside) in the case of finding no commercial HC's is lower but the upside could be massive, far outweighing the risk...OMO.. You most likely won't like it, but do i give a ****..
chuckles
- 09 Sep 2012 18:26
- 1506 of 2393
And I'm a very simple minded person grannyboy cheerleader. You must be the only cheerleader in the history of these blogs to follow another poster around on every site.
Problem with pro-ramper is that if he stuck to posting facts and stuff from reliable websites, such as FOGL's own and did it on an occasional basis that would be triffic. But he adds his own opinion and commentary as if he knows what he's talking about, but anyone with a geological background knows he's spouting rubbish most of the time. Can he read a well log? Nope. He stated RKH had only one offer on the table, untrue they had six. Does that make him a liar?
Who cares, this time next year Rodders, we'll be millionaires
grannyboy
- 09 Sep 2012 18:59
- 1507 of 2393
chucky yes we've noticed you're a simple minded person by your infantile post and the posting of photo's, i supose we should be more tolerant of the feeble minded, its just that you're are like a "spoiled" feeble minded brat.
As to Proselenes postings, he does post very good information, Its just that YOU don't like it....
At least you know when we post on other sites who we are, we're not forever changing our user name, the only problem there is idiots like you pick up on it and turn it into a weapon for your diatribe... What user names do you use on other sites?...
And like they say you have to be in it to win it!!.. Take it you're not...lmao
cynic
- 09 Sep 2012 20:19
- 1508 of 2393
so you kep staying "little poodle" ..... as i told your master (alter ego), i have no need to lie, so if i say i hold a stock then that is a matter of fact .... my logic for so doing is well-posted .... if you choose not to believe then that's your prob not mine, and is more a reflection of yourself than anything else
similarly, if i happen to think that P is lying through his back teeth when he says he holds 200k at +/-40p, does it really matter? ...... if he is, then it shows what a total arsehole he is with no investment brain of any kind, for clearly he does not have a "high risk fund" of several million
grannyboy
- 09 Sep 2012 22:02
- 1509 of 2393
Its so obvious i'm hitting a nerve with you cynic by the fact you revert to belittling juvenile nonsense, just like your buddy chuckles..
Yes please repeat your logic for holding here, as i can't remember decyphering out of you usual cynical post?!!.
cynic
- 10 Sep 2012 06:52
- 1510 of 2393
go back and look for yourself if you're interested; i have better things to do
chuckles
- 10 Sep 2012 07:06
- 1511 of 2393
I see CHAR are going well, 10 billion bbls + OIP and not a drop found.
blackdown
- 10 Sep 2012 08:38
- 1513 of 2393
Or maybe a number of people heading for the exit.
grannyboy
- 10 Sep 2012 08:46
- 1514 of 2393
Yes if YOU can't put up with the RISK's ,DON'T invest in the O&G sector!!!...Simples.
Shortie
- 10 Sep 2012 10:41
- 1515 of 2393
78p I reckon by the end of the day.