Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

New Biom Technologies (BIOM)     

hangon - 16 Jul 2010 15:31

DYOR - - - - - - - - - Biom Technologies mid-July 2010 AIM
This is the new resting place for Stanelco, the wonder producer of starch-based food-trays...only they didn't catch on.Over the last 10 years to 2010 the 0.1p shares traded abour 2.5p then shot up to 24p during 2005 with promise of Tray-Trials I understand. Within a year or so, they fell to new depths and finished at 0.2p Of course they were full-list then and some were held in ISA's hoping there would be a big profit...only now these are distressed sales as the Company slunk off to AIM, presumably "...to provide better shareholder-value"
Perhaps someone closer to the Co. can explain why the new name is Biome
....rhymes with Home. Often it is done to remove the previous sp-history.
Could it be..so new investors can bask in ignorance, etc. I'm not aware of any "change" in fortune for SEO, rather the reverse.
In my limited experience, the longer the name of a company the longer you have to wait for any return...Huh . . . . . .
. SEO had been a terrible investment.
DYOR.
Can Biome be any worse...?
EDIT ( 24April2017)- "just woken up" -me not BIOME - sp is 154, but I note about June 2013 there was what looks like a CONsolidation . . do I recall many LT investors were sold-short?... as I believe the (new share) numbers were terrible! . . . Anyone?

kimoldfield - 29 Mar 2012 16:37 - 264 of 644

In your 300 room villa by the Med!

3 monkies - 29 Mar 2012 16:41 - 265 of 644

Golly Gosh - Kim is that what they will be providing in Heaven in 2062? Something to look forward to then!!

greekman - 29 Mar 2012 16:53 - 266 of 644

Hi Kimoldfield,

In 2062, I will be 114, so I will look forward to Wine and Women, didnt mention song as at that age my voice wont be up to it.
Like the idea of Champagne and Fillet pills though as my nashers may be getting a bit worn by then.
No smutty comments you lot!

kimoldfield - 29 Mar 2012 16:54 - 267 of 644

:o)

skinny - 10 Apr 2012 15:59 - 268 of 644

A "when they were up, they were up" day - currently +23%.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=BIOM&S

skinny - 25 Apr 2012 07:16 - 269 of 644

Trading Update.

Trading Update
Total Group revenues achieved for the first three months of the year were £4.6m (Q1 2011: £5.6m). This is ahead of the final quarter of 2011 and close to the 2011 quarterly average of £4.8m. We anticipate performance to be second half weighted this year and consequently expect sales growth to increase in both divisions as the year progresses.

The Group's cash position at 31st March 2012 was £1.8m (31st December 2011: £2.4m). The reduction of £0.6m was due to a mixture of trading performance and further working capital investments.

greekman - 25 Apr 2012 08:03 - 270 of 644

Looks like whoever unloaded that 5 Mil yesterday made the right decision.
All I can see from the trading update are the usual excuses, the only difference being is it appears they expected this decrease.
I would love to see a video of todays AGM, to see if the board actually squirm or just brush the facts off that Biome are going nowhere except down.
I have said before that I am only holding for CGT purposes to put against any gains. If these go any lower might consider contacting HMRC and seeing if I can declare my holdings as worthless. I understand that if any share holdings reach a value that are such a percentage loss they can be declared 'of no value'. This means you can write the share value off against any gains, without selling those shares.
Strange I know, but if anyone delves into this they will find it is true, and at an average of around 15p purchase price I am what I think anyone would agree is a significant loss against investment.
Before anyone goes down the road of, 'It was my risk', I agree, but as many have stated, over the years the management have been 'less than open' (understatement), which to me means that, yes, this investment was down to me, but if you don't have all the facts, or/and facts/figures have been unclear (again understatement) how the hell can anyone make there best judgments.
Of course the AIM has rules that protect the investor, 'don't they!

We continually read of managements being rewarded for failure. If Biome go down that line, this lot will be in line for millions.

NOTE.........Did you know that when the price of a first class stamp goes up to 60p, if you wanted to write a letter to the board telling them what you think of them, you would have to sell 352 shares to buy the stamp.

kimoldfield - 25 Apr 2012 09:02 - 271 of 644

You would have to sell 429 now Greek!

Balerboy - 25 Apr 2012 09:05 - 272 of 644

I'll send 2nd class........bought 400 over the last few weeks, keep me going for a year or two

greekman - 25 Apr 2012 09:13 - 273 of 644

Finally sold, so completely out.
I wish all those still in the best of luck, as I get no pleasure from seeing any investor screwed.

kimoldfield - 25 Apr 2012 09:24 - 274 of 644

Bad luck Greek but as you say, at least you can offset against gains.

BB, I had hoped that BIOM would announce that the increased expenditure was due to a strategic investment in the purchase of thousands of 1st class stamps!

Balerboy - 25 Apr 2012 09:24 - 275 of 644

Blimey greek bit extreme, if you were that short of a postage stamp I'd have lent you one.,.

greekman - 25 Apr 2012 09:50 - 276 of 644

Thanks Balerboy,

But with BIOME shares, could you afford to post it to me!

Regards to all, as probably won't post on here again, some no doubt thinking, 'Thank goodness for that!

skinny - 31 May 2012 07:37 - 277 of 644

RNS Number : 4649E

Biome Technologies PLC

31 May 2012

Biome Technologies plc ("Biome", "the Company" or "the Group")

Trading Update

In the trading statement released by Biome on 25 April, it was stated that revenues were slower to achieve than expected in the first quarter, particularly in the Bioplastics Division. Unfortunately, sales within this division have been markedly below our expectation during April and May. The Board now believes that this will have a significant adverse impact on the Group results for the full year; this will be particularly felt in the first half. The RF Division is trading in line with the Board's expectations and its order pipeline remains strong.

Customers of the Group's Bioplastics Division are reporting subdued demand for their own bioplastic end products, particularly in the markets of southern Europe. During 2011, the Italian market for bioplastics became one of the largest in Europe following the implementation of regulations (first introduced in early 2011 and reaffirmed in early 2012) mandating the use of biodegradable products for shopping bags. However, in the early part of May this year Biome became aware that the financial penalty for non-compliance with these regulations would now be deferred until the end of 2013. This has resulted in the recent and significant change in the adoption rate in the Italian market and a broader disruption to the supply and demand balance of bioplastics in Europe. In the current, year the Board expects its joint venture company, Biotec, to be the most adversely affected part of the Group.

The impact of these changes to the dynamics of the bioplastics' market will result in it taking longer than previously anticipated for the Group to reach profitability. The Group's cash balance as at the end of April was GBP1.4m. However, this would have reduced significantly as the year progressed unless action is taken to reduce costs. As a result, the Board is taking steps to reduce cash costs by approximately GBP600k per year. This will better preserve Biome's ability to reach profitability and protect its business model.

Whilst the above developments, which affect the fast development of Biome's bio-plastics market, are disappointing, the Board believes firmly that they constitute a pause in a fast-developing market rather than an indication of anything more fundamental.

Biome continues to progress successfully with new products and technologies to improve its future prospects and develop new markets. The RF Division is performing well and remains a cash generator for the group as a whole. The Durapipe project remains on track and is successfully passing agreed milestones with our partner. The new technology for heat and cold resistant bio-plastic materials continues to gain positive reaction from product tests with prospective customers. The Board expects these new developments to make contributions to turnover in 2013.

-Ends-

Shortie - 31 May 2012 10:27 - 278 of 644

You have to wonder if this is the end, delisting from AIM will no doubt save the company money in the long run.

hangon - 31 May 2012 11:13 - 279 of 644

38% fall in sp . . it seems the bag of potato bits was eaten by the nightwatch staff and no-one dared tell them.
This investment is a joke . . . . are they run by monkies.
A company selling Jubilee flags would make better returns.
EDIT (12July2012)_I see a murmer of excitement as the Euro Court issue looks like it might be over - but that should be TINY news compared with their sales efforts - pathetic, IMHO. There's still time to sell Flags . . . if SportGB wins anything.

driver - 31 May 2012 14:10 - 280 of 644

A bit of nostalgia


http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread

3 monkies - 31 May 2012 14:34 - 281 of 644

Up the creek with othout a paddle I am afraid for me, just another one - hey ho!!!! I don't know about jubilee flags they would have done better selling sand to arabs.

skinny - 19 Jun 2012 07:42 - 282 of 644

9 June 2012

Biome Technologies plc ("Biome", "the Company" or "the Group")
Loan Facility Extension/Directorate Change


Biome Technologies plc is pleased to announce it has concluded an extension of its secured debt facility with Fortis Commercial Finance. The facility, first put in place in May 2011, provides access to additional working capital funding for the Company's subsidiary, Biome Bioplastics, to support its growth. This facility has now been extended to May 2014 and its quantum of up to £2m is governed by various attributes of the debtor balance of Biome Bioplastics. The facility remains unused at present.

Further to measures outlined in its recent Trading Update to reduce cash costs, the Company announces that Declan Brown, Group Finance Director, will be leaving employment with the Company on or before 30th November 2012 to pursue other opportunities. Declan will remain on the Board while his employment continues. At the end of Declan's term of office, the Company's accounting and financial management requirements will be provided on a part-time interim basis by Michael Kayser FCMA, in conjunction with the Group's Financial Controller. Michael is an existing non-executive of the Company and is Chair of the Group's Audit and Remuneration Committees. His previous experience includes roles as Group Finance Director at Laporte PLC for five years and Finance Director of Guinness Brewing Worldwide.

John Standen, Chairman, said: "The Board would like to thank Declan for his support and contribution during his time with us and wish him well for the future."

Further, in accordance with AIM Rule 20, the Company's Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2011 is available for download on its website (www.biometechnologiesplc.com).

-Ends-

skinny - 12 Jul 2012 07:16 - 283 of 644

Patent Litigation Update

Biome is pleased to announce significant positive developments in the patent litigation cases currently being heard against its joint venture company, Biotec.

Biome first announced on 29 May 2007 that it was evaluating claims against Biotec, by Novamont S.p.A ("Novamont"), an Italian competitor. Subsequent updates have clarified that Novamont had brought proceedings in the French and Italian courts against Biotec and SPhere, France (Biome's joint venture partner in Biotec), claiming infringement of the French and Italian designations of a number of Novamont's patents (EP'505, EP'559 and EP'120) by the products that are or have been manufactured and sold by Biotec.

The result of the case being conducted in the Turin court was received by the Company on 10 July 2012. The Board is pleased to report that the court in the first instance has found in favour of Biotec and has revoked the Italian designations of Novamont's patents EP 505, EP '559 (with the exception of claim 12, however this also was found not to be infringed), and EP '120 (claims 21 and 22). This is the first formal finding in the Italian jurisdiction and represents a very encouraging development in this multi-jurisdictional process. Appeal paths are available for these findings in Turin and a parallel case in Milan remains ongoing.

Over the past eighteen months, Biome and its joint venture partner, SPhere, have sought to emphasise the broader validity of Biotec's position in Europe. Following proceedings, SPhere received two German first instance court judgements that the German designation of Novamont's patent EP '559 and EP '120 are invalid in this territory. Subsequently, Novamont has appealed the EP '559 decision. Biotec also engaged in a similar process to demonstrate that the German designation of Novamont's patent EP '505 was invalid in Germany, prior to its expiry in January 2009. In the context of this process, Novamont declared in a legally binding way to the German Federal Patent Court that it will refrain from enforcing the German designation of its patent EP'505 against Biotec in Germany as well as to refrain from claiming any damages from Biotec in connection with the German designation of patent EP '505. Consequently Biotec has withdrawn this invalidity case.

It has been noted before that the first court judgment on this litigation was received in France in April 2010 and was in favour of Biotec and SPhere in that no proof of infringement was found for all three Novamont patents (above) and certain claims of EP '120 were found to be invalid. Various appeal paths in the French court were available to all parties and earlier this year Biotec and SPhere lodged an appeal against the remaining validity of Novamont's patents EP'559 and EP'505 in France. Subsequently, Novamont has appealed the complete French court decision.

Biome and Biotec continue to take professional and technical advice with regard to this litigation. The Board has sought and will continue to seek complete resolution of this matter as soon as it is feasible.

-Ends-
Register now or login to post to this thread.