goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
hewittalan6
- 01 Sep 2006 08:25
- 5284 of 81564
Another one of those golden cross thingies approaching bos.
BBC.
Alan
Marc3254
- 01 Sep 2006 11:07
- 5285 of 81564
Can I therefore sue my parents, in particular my mother for stress during birth?
Im sure this was a stressful time for me and I had no say in the matter. I dont remember any warning signs saying ' Caution you are about to be squeezed through a very small gap'
hewittalan6
- 01 Sep 2006 11:33
- 5288 of 81564
I once had an intelligent thought. Kept it in a box for years in case I ever needed it, but now I can't find the damn box.
Marc3254
- 01 Sep 2006 11:37
- 5289 of 81564
Damm!!!
hewittalan6
- 01 Sep 2006 11:56
- 5292 of 81564
The same person who decided to smash the Cochineal beetle into little pieces to make his food go pink.
Marc3254
- 04 Sep 2006 16:19
- 5297 of 81564
dogs? sorry thought you were talking about some of my old girlfriends. I didnt blow thrm they blew me. You can see how I got confused.
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 06:42
- 5298 of 81564
"Quote of the week".
I sometimes think I have a different script to the rest of the world. I have now had it confirmed that if I am insane then the guy quoted below has gone way past insanity into the dreamy hills and fluffy clouded skies at the other side.
Below is from the court case of a blind and deaf man being prosecuted for driving a car while being guided by his friend who was banned from driving. The defence lawyer simply couldn't recognise sanity if it had big flashing lights on it!
Defence solicitor Timothy Gascoyne invited the bench to acquit his client of dangerous driving.
In his closing submissions, the lawyer told the court: "The question is not whether his driving was dangerous, but whether being blind makes it dangerous.''
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 06:48
- 5299 of 81564
From the same case;
Prosecutor Peter Love asked Pc Austin if he had noticed anything about Aziz. Pc Austin replied: "I did - he didn't have any eyes, Your Worships.''
You really couldn't make this up!! Even in their pomp, Monty Python would never have come up with a sketch as ridiculous and off the wall as this, and this remember, is real life. A real and educated human being is trying to argue that a deaf man with no eyes, leg tremors and bouts of serious depression, driving a car in a built up area, while being guided by a banned driver, is not dangerous!! And you thought your job was difficult!!!
bosley
- 05 Sep 2006 09:24
- 5300 of 81564
alan, 'kin brilliant!! :))
bosley
- 05 Sep 2006 12:53
- 5302 of 81564
no, not too soon at all, alan. :)) i wondered how long it would take .
hewittalan6
- 05 Sep 2006 13:01
- 5303 of 81564
Feel free to pass it around.
I've sent it to that solicitor in the earlier article. He will believe it is real and be phoning the BBC threatening to sue.