Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Empyrean Energy (EME) (EME)     

PapalPower - 21 Nov 2005 08:12

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EME&Size=big.chart?symb=uk%3Aeme&compidx=aaaaa%3AEmpyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

Confidant - 28 Nov 2006 09:36 - 566 of 2087

oilyrag

I did the calculation on your $2.5 / thousand cubic feet. Probably got the decimal point in the wrong place as it looks way way to high

I work on the following

1TCF found but not ready to go a) $200m in North Sea
b) $50m in the middle of nowhere a-la VOG,COIL
etc

1TCF ready to come out of the ground
a) North Sea -- $800m
b) $400m in the middle of nowhere

THese are low but reasonable IMHO as the shares do not trade abover these levels normally Look at VOG for instance


Big Al - 28 Nov 2006 20:21 - 567 of 2087

Do you guys ever include the costs of getting the stuff out? You have to drill the wells, put in pipelines and platforms and pay ongoing working costs. There are also the vagiaries of the gas market, which is an awful lot more volatile than the oil one.


Anyway, I digress a bit off topic. Wonder what tomorrow's weekly update will say - whiff or no whiff? ;-)

seawallwalker - 29 Nov 2006 07:12 - 568 of 2087

No whiff

They have stopped short of td to run wireline logs.

Looks promising.

"Sugarloaf Hosston Prospect, Texas USA
-------------------------------------

AIM quoted Empyrean Energy PLC today announces that as at 6am Texas time on 28th
November 2006, the Sugarloaf-1 exploration well located in the onshore Gulf
Coast Basin was at a depth of 20,896 feet (6,371 metres). The current operation
is conditioning the hole and preparing to run wire-line logs.

Since the last report released on 21st November 2006, the well has continued to
drill in the primary target of the Sugarloaf-1 well.

It is expected that the running of the wire-line logs and interpretation of
these and other geological information will take several days.

Big Al - 29 Nov 2006 08:10 - 569 of 2087

I think they've TD'd sww. Slightly shorter than planned. Wouldn't read too much into it, but obviously no gas shows for a while??

cynic - 29 Nov 2006 08:13 - 570 of 2087

and clearly the market is unimpressed

Big Al - 29 Nov 2006 08:17 - 571 of 2087

The writing was in last week's, cynic - no whiffs!

;-)))

Big Al - 29 Nov 2006 08:18 - 572 of 2087

PS - they've had gas, but was it as much as they'd hoped? We'll find out in due course.

It wouldn't be clever if project #3 came up short methinks.

seawallwalker - 29 Nov 2006 08:19 - 573 of 2087

Market certainly don't like it!

Of course experience tells me that running the logs means nothing.......

Woodside do a lot of that offshore Mauritania........ test dry holes.

cynic - 29 Nov 2006 08:35 - 574 of 2087

do hope this thread is not becoming anal ..... lol!

seawallwalker - 29 Nov 2006 08:47 - 575 of 2087

Ha ha ha................I'd better change the wording, no sod it, I'll leave it!

TheMaster - 29 Nov 2006 11:15 - 576 of 2087

EME's Sugarloaf-1 venture partner 'Adelph' AGM report states the drilled well has 50.5m aggregate gas shows:

http://www.adelphienergy.com.au/files/presentations/ASX%20Release%2028%20November%202006%20-%20Adelphi%202006%20AGM%20Presentation.pdf

Currently running wire logs to determine production test decision!

cynic - 29 Nov 2006 11:48 - 577 of 2087

"drilled well has 50.5m aggregate gas shows" ...... how significant an amount is that? ..... not hugely is my guess, for otherwise sp would have shot up rather than fallen, but am happy to be contradicted

hlyeo98 - 29 Nov 2006 17:16 - 578 of 2087

I don't think it means anything significant at all.

TheMaster - 29 Nov 2006 19:46 - 579 of 2087

I say that depth of 50.5m (170ft) gas shows over many square miles is huge, wire logging should be completed by the weekend.

oilyrag - 29 Nov 2006 20:31 - 580 of 2087

No matter how big the find if at all, don't lose sight of the fact that it is only 6.5% EME's.

Big Al - 29 Nov 2006 21:31 - 581 of 2087

The Master - trust me, it ain't huge!!

50.5m is decent (although not outstanding) in a single horizon, but it would seem this is split over several intervals, i.e. interbedded. It is impossible to map these on seismic and therefore testing is the only way of confirming the potential. Wireline logs should give an idea of porosity, etc.

Personally, I'd hate to be holding for now. If the logs are poor, EME is on the scrapheap IMO with 3 out of 3 disasters. If the logs are decent I still don't see massive upside, but it provides good trading.

;-)

hlyeo98 - 29 Nov 2006 22:30 - 582 of 2087

There will be more downside for EME then

Big Al - 30 Nov 2006 02:30 - 583 of 2087

Dunno about that - wait until after logs and possible testing to be sure one way or the other.

It's probably safe to say EME is probably not the prospect it was a year ago at less than 40p, though, given how their prospects have failed to produce anything thus far?

tcdmct - 30 Nov 2006 08:45 - 584 of 2087

oilyrag - 29 Nov 2006 20:31 - 580 of 583
No matter how big the find if at all, don't lose sight of the fact that it is only 6.5% EME's.

I would say its better having 6.5% of something rather than 6.5% of nothing.
Also as far as i know there are 4 companies with holdings in this,they would not still be spending good money looking if they didnt think there would be something worth it at the end.
My guess is there will be somthing good here,and they are keeping it lo key at the moment to get the cheapest share price,then we will see it fly.

oilyrag - 30 Nov 2006 08:54 - 585 of 2087

Hi tcdmct I agree with you, and as I am holding I hope you are right, I was merely pointing out that they are the minnows in all of this and therefore wouldn't be earning the lions share.
Register now or login to post to this thread.