there seems to be some heavy resistance around these level with a lot of potential upside.

Agreed. It's as you say a good divi that looks safe. A lot more than can be said about general interests rates. Over the next 12 months I can see many investors coming back into the market looking for good divi returns, especially after the .5% drop in interest rates announced earlier today.

Lower sales, that was expected though. GSK has a bit of a debt but RBS can loose that much cash in 6 months, with nothing to show at the end!

Near 1 year low. Should this be in this market? As you said above good divi. Defensive which given that this bear isn't over yet should serve it well. Only slight concern will be the impact of falling dollar over the medium term on earnings.

Drugs pipeline?

http://sharecast.com/cgi-bin/sharecast/story.cgi?story_id=2632957

Thanks for that Falcothou. GDP seems to have polarised the market now and GSK defensive qualities are starting to shine through. Let's see if the consumer confidence figures later can help GSK's cause. I see S&P is predicted to open below key support at 741. Could be interesting. I think this could be the start of a nice run.

Although there has been plenty of talk/rumour re Glaxo buying Astra recently, Glaxo have said that no such plans are in the offering.
But the news from the last few days, may just be a sign that a takeover will happen.
On a personal view....I have no idea, if such a deal would be good for Glaxo and the pharmaceutical sector or not.

The third huge pharmaceuticals deal of the year was struck yesterday as Roche agreed to buy the 44 per cent of Genentech that it did not already own for $46.8 billion (34 billion), giving the Swiss group scope to cut costs and complete control over a range of cancer drugs.

Merck have also agreed to buy Schering-Plough for $41.1 billion (29.8 billion) in a deal that would create the world's second-largest pharmaceuticals group.

Di-worsification imho,keep sucking in the minnows,too much indigestion with a big fish!

Nice to be right sometimes. Why companies such as Glaxo are an even better bet.

A few months ago I mentioned that I expected investors to be looking a the Stock Markets again to make money, especially in the blue chip sector, mainly due to the low interest levels everywhere else.
I also mention that I thought the popular, so called 100% safe haven of Government Bonds would become a less safe investment due to the vast amounts being proposed by the government.
On reading todays Telegraph, I see that one of many proposed big auctions re these gilts has failed for the first time since 1995 to be fully taken up.
Fears are growing that the government may not be able to cover these gilts.
Obviously if an auction this early on in the list fails, then future auction prospects look poor.
Either the government will need to withdraw further bonds from auction (something they definitely can't do) or lower the price (something that will increase their direct debt).
You can't expect to flood the bond/guilt market and expect any other reaction that you would get from flooding any market. Surely that is basic economics.
They are quickly running out of get out clauses.
his makes the stock market taking in the risk/reward factor, although still of more risk than gilts, a much better bet.
All IMHO of course.

From the Press.

GlaxoSmithKline was in late stage talks on Sunday to acquire Stiefel Laboratories, a US maker of skin care pharmaceuticals, for roughly $3bn, according to a source close to the matter, says the FT.
Obviously such news is difficult to keep quiet, but as this was in the media over the week-end, but only officially released about 1 hour after UK market opened, (why not at 0700 as the Asian markets had already released it).
Of course no one privy to this info have acted prior to official release, Have they!

good article on GSK at www.tradinghelpdesk.com

Are they paying you to ramp that site ?

Many punters are suprised why the sp has not zoomed up due to Swine Flu and Relenza. Perhaps this is a reason.

10 Utahns, 2 others sue pharmaceutical company.

Not sure if this has anything to do with the sp over last few days not gaining as much as people expected, but it looks as if GSK have another law suit against hem. Perhaps it leaked out a few days ago.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705300723,00.html

I appreciate all drug companies the size of Glaxo are always in a process of being sued by someone or other.

From Canna Zine News.

April 2009 will go down as the month the Glaxo SmithKline marketing department really earned their corn.

As a result of a nationwide campaign to sell GSK's new weight-loss drug Alli, (AKA Orlistat, AKA Xenical), it quickly became the fastest selling over-the-counter weight-loss medication..ever. And as if its success wasn't already assured, you can now find it in the pharmacy at your favourite branch of Tesco, Asda, Morrisons or Sainsbury's.

Ideal if you want to pick up some whilst shopping for burgers, buns and beer.

END.

The next 12/24 months is looking good for Glaxo's drug line. As they are loosing some drugs to generics, they need new lines such as Alli.

I know Big Pharma will probably never reach the dizzy heights it did in the distant past but as regulation and trials cost have increased and medicare budgets reduced life has become harder.For that reason generics seem to have an incredibly easy ride, no research cost just set up a high tech factory, bit of marketing and the dollars roll in. It would seem fairer if the patent should last longer to reflect this distortion

Falcothou,

Fully Agree. The generic problem is hitting Glaxo and other big pharma's hard.
You only have to put Generic drugs into Google to see how big the business is getting. But a Google search also brings up many examples of Generic drugs having to be withdrawn. The figures do not make good reading (to the health of those taking generic drugs). Whilst I appreciate there is always a risk to ALL drugs of a side effect resulting in a withdrawal notice, you only have to look back at history (Thalidomide for example) to see the risks.
Saying that, generic drugs must be by testing standards far behind none generic in safety (unless someone out there can explain to a layman differently).
That google search re Generic drugs, makes scary reading.
I can see that in the not too distant future, such a drug will cause untold damage, then late as usual the powers that be will consider more the safety effect of a drug over cost. Cost appears to be a more important factor in the present climate.
The WHO already has powers that can be bought forward in a World Pandemic. One of these being that they can allow a generic drug to be produced, before the initial drug patent has expired.
Lessons it appears are soon forgot.

re the WHO powers re above. I read this somewhere over the week-end, but can't find it now. Anyone assist.

News just out (But not yet on MoneyAm).

News just out re increase in prescriptions of antiviral (USA).The number of U.S. antiviral retail prescriptions soared to 277,196 for the week that ended May 1, compared with 14,366 for the week that ended April 24, according to pharmaceutical market research company SDI. (Massive increase)
These show, that more than 90 percent of the antiviral prescriptions were dispensed for Tamiflu. About 5 percent were written for GlaxoSmithKline Plc's Relenza, with the rest for older drugs.

This is no doubt one of the reasons for Glaxo poor sp of last few days. Although just released it has been in the media for several days, that Tamiflu sales are far out pacing Relenza.

As per the next few weeks/months...Due to the continuing increase in statements that Tamiflu is having less effect (resistance), no doubt the percentage of sales will have a turnaround effect. According to many articles, the general feeling is that Relenza will take over the lead in sales.

Note... As a test I have contacted 2 drug supply companies. Both have sold out of Relenza with both offering Tamiflu as an alternative. Try it yourself. Shows that Glaxo need to up production asap, which according to another article they are in the process of doing.

Glaxo is only low because it is a defensive and who wants a 8% yield when at the moment but for not much longer, you can make it on a bank share in a morning. Tamiflu does have some nasty side effects e.g. 18 suicides in Japanese adolescents. nausea, vomiting confusion. Pharma are also under attack from counterfeit drugs(organised crime) and they are not going to counterfeit generics because the profit aren't there. I think the government has got it wrong...if this is a mild strain of swine flu people should be queueing up to get infected by it to generate antibodies rather than hiding away, those affected in first batch in 1918 tended to survive the more vicious second strain....

The divi is very solid though. That is one of the reasons I increased my holdings last Friday (not the best timed buy).
I would be looking at banks more if I was not now fully committed to long plays.
I do agree re the comment...should be queueing up to get infected by it to generate antibodies rather than hiding away, those affected in first batch in 1918 tended to survive the more vicious second strain....

I hate to say anything in our governments favour, but the problem all Governments have is dammed if you do dammed if you don't.
If this strain had developed into a more serious strain and the world governments had not 'pressed the button' there would have been hell to play. I feel that for the same reason (they dare not get it wrong) so they can not say anything else but to stay clear of infected people.
But when/if this does come back toward winter (the flu season) with a vengeance, those who have been exposed will no doubt be the best armed to fight it.

Latest re Wellbutrin XL,

Looking at the figures, the sale of Wellbutrin XL looks to be very much in Glaxo's favour. Or am I missing something.

I think 900 would be a good buying oppertunity, as IMHO Swine Flu will return big style this winter with many deaths worldwide.