Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Empyrean Energy (EME) (EME)     

PapalPower - 21 Nov 2005 08:12

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=EME&Size=big.chart?symb=uk%3Aeme&compidx=aaaaa%3AEmpyrean Energy

Web site : http://www.empyreanenergy.com

oilyrag - 28 Jan 2007 08:56 - 654 of 2087

Another thought PP, is that if Sugarloaf was going to produce cashflow, then why would EME need another placement. Maybe they have nothing on any of their projects, therefore the need for cash.

PapalPower - 28 Jan 2007 09:00 - 655 of 2087

I think they are just making sure of their jobs, so rushed to get the money ahead of Sugarloaf while they could, and the ramp of Sugarloaf will allow those people providing the cash with a chance to sell and take profits.

There is a good chance, like you say, that they "know" none of their present projects has much chance of success.

oilyrag - 29 Jan 2007 08:27 - 656 of 2087

Is 2 months a bit too much time for testing gas flow rates, or are they making sure there is some intrest in the company during placement.

tcdmct - 30 Jan 2007 09:40 - 657 of 2087

Big Al - 27 Jan 2007 21:17 - 652 of 656
tcdmct - I guess we all get what we deserve in life.

And what do you deserve in this life Big Al,would it be something to do with Rodger and the planet Anus.

cynic - 30 Jan 2007 09:46 - 658 of 2087

sorry if Al touched a raw nerve or even a fluttering sphincter! ...... he and i do not always agree, but in this instance we concur that EME is a load of shit, so i guess the company, rodger, anus and sphincter all have that in common!

PapalPower - 30 Jan 2007 11:03 - 659 of 2087

LOL cynic...

hlyeo98 - 30 Jan 2007 11:25 - 660 of 2087

In short, get out of EME before it goes to 10p or wrapped up 4 good.

cynic - 30 Jan 2007 11:31 - 661 of 2087

are you trying to persuade me to short this stock? ..... lol!

hlyeo98 - 30 Jan 2007 12:13 - 662 of 2087

lol, cynic. No...EME will short itself.

cynic - 30 Jan 2007 12:26 - 663 of 2087

half tempted, except that if EME come good against the odds, sp could rocket and will not be able to implement stop loss properly

hlyeo98 - 30 Jan 2007 13:06 - 664 of 2087

I really doubt EME will come good

Big Al - 30 Jan 2007 18:52 - 665 of 2087

tcdmct

As ever the eloquent reply. Get a little objectivity and you might make a few bob. People forever holding EME and its ilk are losers.

That includes you and I suspect the EME sceptics will be frequenting this BB long after your like have crashed and burned. You're 10 a penny.

;-)

PS - my parted sphincter has just dropped one on your cranium - might wake you up to the reality. ROFLMAO!

tcdmct - 31 Jan 2007 10:20 - 666 of 2087

dont think so big all,i will leave you with your sunday school for that.

hlyeo98 - 31 Jan 2007 10:54 - 667 of 2087

tcdmct, don't love your shares...love your money and don't live in dreams.

cynic - 31 Jan 2007 10:56 - 668 of 2087

let him do his own thing .... you never know; perhaps EME will find Eldorado against the odds ...... if i was THAT certain they won't, i would short, and i haven't even though quite strongly tempted .... have you?

HARRYCAT - 31 Jan 2007 16:22 - 669 of 2087

Fair enough that EME is not performing well at the moment & that many are disillusioned with the management and the misleading/evasive news releases, but it is not all doom & gloom, imo.
I believe that EME are drilling 9 different targets in 2007 and that the Texas & Gulf coast projects still have potential to produce good results. All are being drilled at a fixed price, so no risk of spiralling costs. I am not sure why they persist in pouring money in to the Glantal project, but the other U.S. sites still have a reasonable up side to them. Victoria Petroleum, Sun resources & Wandoo Energy, the parteners of EME, seem to think the same. I do not think that EME is any higher risk than GOO, RKH, DES or even possibly VOG. Many exploration companies operate at a loss, so valuation or the balance sheet are not particularly relevant, though I concede we could have done without the issuing of more shares, thus diluting the value of the current ones.
As for holders of EME stock being losers, a loss is only realised when the stock is sold & with no disrespect intended, the investors room is full of people who have got their fingers burnt, SEO, ELP, SBT, PRTY to name but a few stocks, but until EME shares become valueless, no one is a loser. It's interesting to note how many of you sceptics discreetly keep your eye on EME just in case you are proved wrong!

cynic - 31 Jan 2007 16:28 - 670 of 2087

Harry ... sorry m8, but that is deluding yourself, just as much as claiming a profit befiore it is banked ...... my views on SEO, ELP, PRTY are already well voiced and i have no reason to change them .....

GOO
is (imo) very flaky, though I am a holder ..... only crumb of comfort is that Mr P continues to hold 10%, but even that is soemthing of a rationalisation.

VOG
the jury remains out until the next report ..... if they disappoint, then watch sp plummet .... am still a holder

EME
has been consistent ...... lots of promise followed by total dross

HARRYCAT - 31 Jan 2007 16:53 - 671 of 2087

So, if one of the 2007 target wells does produce the goods, you will not be taking advantage of any rise in the sp on principle?

cynic - 31 Jan 2007 16:58 - 672 of 2087

principle has little bearing on share trading, though i confess there are some, like Mr Timmis and RPT that i would not touch with yours let alone mine, but that is from total lack of trust ..... as it happens, RPT has quadrupled from its 2006 low.

HARRYCAT - 31 Jan 2007 17:00 - 673 of 2087

Hmmm.... Not sure that you answered the question! :o)
Register now or login to post to this thread.