Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

rawdm999 - 04 Nov 2010 09:11 - 9843 of 81564

'due to inadequate, inefficient but costly private sector.'

Absolutely hilarious.

Stan - 04 Nov 2010 09:22 - 9844 of 81564

If you agree or disagree with someone's point of view then why not try and answer with a message explaining why you hold your view and which does not contain abuse against the person that you are conversing with.

Giving people abuse on a public message board (or anywhere else come to that) affords the abuser no credit at all.

This_is_me - 04 Nov 2010 09:43 - 9845 of 81564

Just squelsh Fred - you know it makes sense!

aldwickk - 04 Nov 2010 09:44 - 9846 of 81564

Stan


If you agree or disagree with someone's point of view then why not try and answer with a message explaining why you hold your view


People have been there and done that ......... Why don't you give it a try and answer him ? I would be interested to know how you get on.


Stan - 04 Nov 2010 09:53 - 9847 of 81564

"People have been there and done that" not quite true is it? Their answers have also included abuse.

Which as I say affords no credit.

aldwickk - 04 Nov 2010 10:16 - 9848 of 81564

Stan

As I said Why don't you give it a try and answer him ? without abuse like I did and greekman and other's.

Stan - 04 Nov 2010 10:36 - 9849 of 81564

"As I said Why don't you give it a try and answer him ? without abuse like I did and greekman and other's." To busy, And beside the point.

As said, abuse affords no credit.

Fred1new - 04 Nov 2010 10:39 - 9850 of 81564

AlD.

The Iraq debacle and the Afghanistan adventure has done more harm to Britain's reputation, than any relief effort and it is obvious from the Terrorist risk level that this is so.

The ref "due to inadequate, inefficient but costly private sector" was a short cut and refers to the cost of outsourcing and the relative disproportionate cost of doing so.

Even the "oik" is slashing the costs of the outsourcing "contracts".

Many of the contracts with the PRIVATE SECTOR are being reviewed down in Pricing.

This should/could have been done before, but more honest pricing from the "private sector" would have made this unnecessary.

I think, if there had been more appropriate and informed management
(better trained) making the contracts, rather than cosying up of public and private sector this "overcharging" would have been prevented.

Some of the outsourcing of services from the private sector to the public service have ended up with appalling standards. (Have a look at the NHS and then various areas of IT contracting and subcontracting)

Fred1new - 04 Nov 2010 10:39 - 9851 of 81564

.

aldwickk - 04 Nov 2010 10:56 - 9852 of 81564

Stan

That was a pathetic answer

Stan - 04 Nov 2010 11:04 - 9853 of 81564

Aldo,

Your prime reason for posting seems to be "mainly just to argue" rather then to have an intelligent discussion with , which I have no interest in.

hilary - 04 Nov 2010 11:13 - 9854 of 81564

Intelligent discussion and Fred. Should those words be used together in the same sentence?

Fred1new - 04 Nov 2010 11:29 - 9855 of 81564

The Hairy one has spoken.

aldwickk - 04 Nov 2010 11:31 - 9856 of 81564

First it was Fred now we have his brother Stan ....... which one is the fat one ?

Stan - 04 Nov 2010 11:34 - 9857 of 81564

My point made, thank you.

Fred1new - 04 Nov 2010 12:04 - 9858 of 81564

Ald,

You don't have to be like the other boys and girls in your school yard.

Imitation is the poorest form of flattery.

rawdm999 - 04 Nov 2010 12:10 - 9859 of 81564

Stan

If you comment was directed at me I look forward to your apology. You might want to re-read all the areas where I have challenged fred' posts. I have never been abusive towards fred (in fact you may not believe this but it does happen in the other direction) but can't stand by and let him feely post his thoughts without challenge. Funnily enough, thoughts he can never justify with fact.

aldwickk - 04 Nov 2010 12:22 - 9860 of 81564

but can't stand by and let him feely post his thoughts without challenge.

Stan can he is to busy .

Fred1new - 04 Nov 2010 12:36 - 9861 of 81564

Raw,

Which words in my recent postings didn't you understand

Try re-reading them, and then applying a little thought to the overall content of them.

It is interesting and surprising to me, to watch the press and media and see that it is already being critical and damning of this coalition misgovernment.

In many ways similar to the dying days of previous government.

But, I can see it being justified, as the economic principles being applied by the coalition is equivalent to Biscuit Tin accountancy and likely to prolong any recovery period.

rawdm999 - 04 Nov 2010 13:30 - 9862 of 81564

You always tell me to try re-reading your posts fred. I bow to your greater intellectual capacity. Then again, why don't you post in a clear, concise manner to save me the trouble.
Register now or login to post to this thread.