doodlebug4
- 27 Apr 2013 11:50
Topped the share charts on Friday following a lucrative contract announcement and is rumoured to have several more contracts in the pipeline.
Website www.coms.com
Dil
- 05 Feb 2014 09:51
- 741 of 1120
lol , I'm a crap trader Kim and at close of business yesterday had no position in COMS for the first time since last summer and didn;t feel comfortable.
Haven't done the maths yet but I'm sure I'm now in these for nothing plus at least a 1 bagger profit on original investment.
If the deal Breith was talking about comes off then I have no doubt there will be a big placing / rights issue but it will transform the company into a much bigger company overnight and have a positive effect.
If it doesn't come off then it still shows his intentions and his eye for a deal which is also a positive.
Happy to sit back and watch it play out now but have left a couple of cheeky buy orders in at lower prices looking for a spike down.
HARRYCAT
- 05 Feb 2014 09:57
- 742 of 1120
'Cheeky buy orders'? .......... Somewhere around the 6p level? ;o)
kimoldfield
- 05 Feb 2014 10:23
- 743 of 1120
Have done a few lucrative trades over the last few months but got caught out with a buy at 9.74 on Monday! Still ahead overall though so can't complain......yet!
doodlebug4
- 05 Feb 2014 10:26
- 744 of 1120
I don't know anything about the Elliot Wave Theory, but these daily chart movements are making me feel seasick.:-)
Dil - I agree with your comments about a possible placing/rights issue.
doodlebug4
- 05 Feb 2014 15:45
- 745 of 1120
I've just had a top-up here - rumour has it that Geoff Foster's "rumour" of a "heavily discounted placing" is totally unfounded! :-)
galatica
- 05 Feb 2014 16:13
- 746 of 1120
Just like QPP today
after such a large rise is normal profit taking will come and strong

halifax
- 05 Feb 2014 16:20
- 747 of 1120
doodle a rumour about a rumour that sounds believable.
doodlebug4
- 05 Feb 2014 16:23
- 748 of 1120
halifax - lol :-)
doodlebug4
- 05 Feb 2014 19:59
- 749 of 1120
Geoff Foster treading on thin ice imo.
Financial Journalism Best Practice Note 2005
Introduction
The newspaper and magazine publishing industry's Code of Practice binds all national and local newspapers, magazines and their websites. Clause 13 of the Code imposes a number of requirements relating to financial journalism, and Clause 1 (Accuracy) also has a particular relevance.
The Code:
• prohibits the use of financial information for the profit of journalists or their associates;
• imposes restrictions on journalists writing about shares in which they or their close families have a significant interest without internal disclosure;
• stops journalists dealing in shares about which they have written recently or intend to write in the near future; and
• requires that financial journalists take care not to publish inaccurate material and to distinguish between comment, conjecture and fact. This is particularly important for any journalists making investment recommendations to readers about whether to buy, sell or hold shares
Dil
- 06 Feb 2014 09:16
- 750 of 1120
Omg the village idiot is posting on this thread !
doodlebug4
- 06 Feb 2014 11:55
- 751 of 1120
It's about time the company issued an RNS just to clarify exactly what is going on. David Breith always seems keen to talk the talk - suddenly he's gone quiet!
doodlebug4
- 06 Feb 2014 17:56
- 752 of 1120
An interesting few days, to put it mildly. For anyone who may be interested - following on from the article which appeared in the Daily Mail on Tuesday morning, ( actually it wasn't even an article, it consisted of two sentences) which had such an effect on the share price I have sent emails to; the Editor of the Daily Mail, the PCC and the FCA asking for some clarification on the guidelines about the Code of Practice presented to financial journalists in this country. I will probably be thrown a few 'dot balls' and the usual pat answers to similar questions, but hey-ho I can be a stubborn pain-in the-neck at times when something riles me!
doodlebug4
- 06 Feb 2014 20:11
- 753 of 1120
I have received a response from Alex Brummer, the City Editor of the Daily Mail regarding the email I sent about Geoff Foster's comments. If I said the response from Brummer was both arrogant and patronising it would be an understatement.
Dil
- 07 Feb 2014 02:23
- 754 of 1120
Send it to me via my moneyam address .... I'll wind the feckers up :-)
Serious doodles the share price is what 8p ??? Two weeks ago it was about 5p , you got to expect a pull back up to say 66% given the speed of the rise.
Breith said he would get it to 10p and he has. Him and company look well run imo and well regarded ... unlike Foster who has been a standing joke with his peers and investors alike for years.
He gets fed sh*te on purpose but often doesn't realise .... harmless guy imo but thick as shit.
Disclaimer : me or anyone I know have never fed any idiot financial journalist living or dead any information that we/they thought might be true in cloud cuckoo land only.
Dil
- 07 Feb 2014 02:25
- 755 of 1120
Hi Geoff :-)
Dil
- 07 Feb 2014 02:41
- 756 of 1120
He used to ramp Calluna and Bioprogress/Meldex if I remember right ... says it all.
doodlebug4
- 07 Feb 2014 09:46
- 757 of 1120
lol Dil! Brummer sounded like a football manager whose star player had just been given a red card for a badly timed tackle:-)
What is the point in having a Code of Practice for financial journalists if it's not enforced. The problem is some journalists think they are above the law.
doodlebug4
- 07 Feb 2014 11:49
- 758 of 1120
kimoldfield
- 07 Feb 2014 16:45
- 759 of 1120
Oops! 138,333,333 new ordinary shares (the "Placing Shares") at 6 pence per share,
halifax
- 07 Feb 2014 16:54
- 760 of 1120
so they have just paid £10m for a loss making company, with a turnover of £10m.