niceonecyril
- 24 Jul 2005 15:48
">
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=4381032
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=4381151
http://www.investegate.co.uk/victoria-oil---38--gas--vog-/rns/final-results/201310250700053729R/
Powered by IST's
VOG is presently drilling Well 104 in its West Medvezhye field,and expected to reach depth in 4 weeks from spud date of 30th June, that makes 27th July(this week).
Results of testing will be sometime mid/late August, with a positive outcome
it could be HUGH.
With estimates of 134BILLION cubic metres of GAS and 201 Million barrels of Gas
Condensate,it will be a Company Maker. The field is in the area of the largest gas field in the WORLD.
Other assets include Kemerkol in Kazakhstan, with C1 reserves of 8.7MBO
and C2 reserves of7.8MBO. Another acquistion is Tamdykol with potental
reserves of 34MBO, it also has interest in 2 blocks in the North Sea.
You can check it out on www.uk-wire.com, and its own site of www.victoriaoilandgas.com.
It has excellent management team led by Kevin Foo, who hopes to turn it into
a Mid Cap Company(�500m+) in the not to distant future.
As i stated earlier in the post, Drilling is almost complete so it won't be long to Lift Off?
Well, Well worth checking out.
cyril
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201111040700164867R
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201111290700139263S
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201112200700132888U
http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201207090700051587H
http://www.investegate.co.uk/victoria-oil---38--gas--vog-/rns/rsm-default/201401130700074445X/
http://www.investegate.co.uk/victoria-oil---38--gas--vog-/rns/interim-results/201402280701321590B/
http://www.investegate.co.uk/CompData.aspx?code=VOG&tab=announcements
lizard
- 08 Jun 2006 11:46
- 694 of 2511
yes but 2.4m buys v 545k sells so far.
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 11:57
- 695 of 2511
sp is now recovering quite well havinmg suddenly dropped to 153 mid it is now 161.5 ...... bad enough, but still
Strawbs
- 08 Jun 2006 12:17
- 696 of 2511
Personally I'd still avoid buying. Although it's one of my former "darling" stocks, and has some very good assets, the market sentiment is far too negative in respect of riskier plays at the moment. Those bullish on the stock can only support the price for so long, and I wonder how many of them have simply bought to make a "quick buck" from the next RNS. A sound stratergy, assuming the RNS is good, and there are enough buyers around to sell on to.
Strawbs.
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 12:19
- 697 of 2511
I was merely observing rather than recommending to buy! ..... markets are far too scary at the moment
Strawbs
- 08 Jun 2006 12:22
- 698 of 2511
Cynic,
Sorry. I didn't mean to infer anything. I was just commenting generally.
Strawbs.
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 12:28
- 699 of 2511
no apology required ... lol!
queen
- 08 Jun 2006 12:28
- 700 of 2511
has anyone got a good/logical explanation as to why we have 2.5m buys vs 0.5m sells and yet the SP is still down 13??
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 12:31
- 701 of 2511
just as a thought ...... i guess it's possible that there is an intrinsic and underlying demand for stock and sp is merely being marked down in an attempt to force some sales (stopped out) ...... however, if there are 3/4 MMs, that is probably unlikely as too difficult to coordinate between them (and illegal!)
Strawbs
- 08 Jun 2006 12:54
- 702 of 2511
Queen,
You probably need level 2 access to understand, but I'll try and explain (as far as I understand it). Firstly you have the market makers, they must buy or sell, and they can dictate the price. Then you have the order book, where others offer to buy or sell blocks of stock, but they can withdraw those orders before they are dealt if they want to. You see the best buy and sell orders on level 1, irrespective of where they come from. Remember that market makers must buy or sell, but they generally only deal is certain sizes, so as each size block is filled, they switch from being a buyer to a seller, or vice versa. They will either be buying at a higher price (rising share) or a lower price (falling share).
Today the order book filled up on the sell side with orders (presumably because someone was desperate to get rid of some large blocks of stock). Each time a sell happend, the market makers (who where supporting the bid), where coming back with lower bids as each of their blocks were filled. The price stabalised when orders where put in on the buy side, so that the market makers where no longer buying and supporting the price.
In affect. People are buying from someone who is desperate to sell, rather than from the market makers. Of course if someone was desperate to buy, the price would go the other way.
Hope that makes sense.
Strawbs.
majormoney
- 08 Jun 2006 13:09
- 703 of 2511
With the market in such a "correction" phase is the share price likely to take off even if the news we await is very good. I have seen the valuations posted and even taking conservative estimates of say, 10 a share in the next few years I would have thought that VOG's share price should have held up better.
Strawbs
- 08 Jun 2006 13:11
- 704 of 2511
Another way to look at it is this. You could buy from the shop (market makers), which means there are fewer left in the shop, or you could buy from me. This still looks like a "buy", but it doesn't affect the levels of stock that the shop holds, because one owner has been changed for another. If the shop decides it want's to sell it's stock for less, then the price will fall, even though it looks like there are hundreds of buyers around.
Strawbs.
Strawbs
- 08 Jun 2006 13:18
- 705 of 2511
Impossible to say where the price will go. I suspect there are lots of other mechanics at work here, rather than just a degree of negative sentiment. If I had to make a best guess, I'd say a good RNS on a good day will see the price rise, but if people have bought in to support losses elsewhere, then the rise could be short lived.
Strawbs.
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 13:19
- 706 of 2511
majormoney ...... i don't know where you get 10 as a conservative estimate of value over the next few years, but sounds more than a little wishful ...... However, I do know that Ambrian's fair value was 330 based on NAV of 512 and then stripping out the Khaz risk factor
scotinvestor
- 08 Jun 2006 13:22
- 707 of 2511
this is still going down.................150p at least but i think 130p. am i the only one here to see sense
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 13:32
- 708 of 2511
scot ...... 130 on the basis of what? ..... and if 130, why not just 30?
lizard
- 08 Jun 2006 13:58
- 709 of 2511
well if he is that confident he should just short it!.
cynic
- 08 Jun 2006 13:59
- 710 of 2511
perhaps he has